Prosecutors to decide Thanathorn’s fate on November 4 following vaccine feedback

On ติดตั้งโซล่าเซลล์Huawei , prosecutors will decide whether or not to indict Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit over feedback he made about Thailand’s AstraZeneca technology-transfer deal. At the beginning of the 12 months, the founding father of the Progressive Movement criticised the federal government for being overly-reliant on Siam Bioscience for Covid-19 vaccines.
The Bangkok Post reviews that Thanathorn faces charges of violating Thailand’s defamation legislation and the Computer Crime Act, however essentially the most serious cost is that of lèse-majesté. The lèse-majesté law, or section 112 of the Criminal Code, prohibits criticising, defaming or in any other case disrespecting the monarchy and carries some harsh punishments.
On January 18, Thanathorn used a Facebook Live broadcast to query the awarding of the AstraZeneca contract to Siam Bioscience, by means of a expertise switch take care of the producer. Siam Bioscience is wholly owned by a subsidiary of the Crown Property Bureau. In the Facebook video, Thanathorn called on the agency and the federal government to share details of the technology-transfer settlement to prove it had been handled transparently.
The Bangkok Post stories that charges of lèse-majesté, violation of the Computer Crime Act, and violation of the defamation regulation had been subsequently filed by Apiwat Khanthong from a government committee charged with investigating the unfold of disinformation in relation to the PM and his administration. Thanathorn’s lawyer, Krissadang Nutjaras, says prosecutors are being requested to confirm if Apiwat has the authority to bring such charges or to hunt Thanathorn’s prosecution.
Krissadang has identified the similarity with an earlier case against Thanathorn, during which the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society had petitioned the Criminal Court to order the removing of the aforementioned Facebook video. In that case, the courtroom rejected the request, ruling that the content of the video did not violate Thailand’s lèse-majesté law..

Leave a Comment